Active Learning Based on  
Student Career Aspirations
Presented by Patrick J. Lyons, St. John's 
University 
at the
Fourth International Business, Economics, Environment and 
Education Summer Symposium, Iona College, June 20, 2009. 
www.patlyons.com/research/IBE3ActiveLearning2009Jun20.htm  
This page uses a collapsible outline.  You can show or hide sublevels by clicking the higher level. 
  - 
	
	Introduction 
  - 
	
	"What Fifty Said" by Robert Frost  
	- 
	
	Students today want to develop critical 
	thinking and communication skills necessary to be successful in business.  
  - 
	
	They seek class environments where they 
	can not only obtain knowledge, but also learn to apply that knowledge to 
	situations meaningful to their future careers.  
	- 
	
	This paper presents an active learning environment (CALOPS)
	developed for an undergraduate operations management course based on 
	the career aspirations of each individual student. 
   
  
  
	- 
	
	Literature Review 
  - Auster and Wylie (2006) active learning 
	framework - four dimensions of the teaching process:
  - 
	
	Context setting  
	- 
	
	Class preparation  
	- 
	
	Class delivery  
	- 
	
	Continuous improvement. 
   
  
  
	- 
	
	Context setting 
		- 
		
		Establishing norms, expectations, and 
		ground rules (Bonwell & Eison, 1991). 
			- 
			
			Exercise 1 - using a career 
			interest inventory to determine a realistic career 
			
			
			http://www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/career1.htm
			  
			- 
			
			Exercise 2 - finding an actual job 
			opportunity consistent with their realistic career 
			
			www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/career2.htm  
			- 
			
			Exercise 3 - finding information 
			about the organization offering the job opportunity 
			
			www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/career3.htm  
			- 
			
			Exercise 4 - formulating their 
			career strategy for the next five years. 
			
			www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/career4.htm. 
   
		  
	  
	- 
	
	Class preparation 
  - 
	
	Unlike lecture, which focuses primarily on content, preparation for active 
	learning requires attention to both content and process.  
	- 
	
	Content - traditional class website
	with: 
  - 
	
	Course outline -
	www.patlyons.com/m3325  
	  
	- 
	
	Calendar - 
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/CalndrA.htm
	   
	- 
	
	Class discussion outlines -
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/chapters/h906.htm
	   
  
	- 
	
	Class Participation Action Item (CPAI) 
  - 
	
	Procedure -
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/ClassPartAI.htm   
	- 
	
	Modify Word document -
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/ClassPartAICh5or6.doc   
	- 
	
	CPAI 
	Submittal Form - 
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/CPAISubmitA.htm
	 
	  
	- 
	
	CPAI 
	File 
	
	  
   
  
  
	- 
	
	Class Delivery 
  - 
	
	Managing class participation effectively is an important element of class 
	delivery (Auster & Wylie, 2006). 
  - 
	
	Ensure well distributed 
	“air time” (Bonwell & Eison, 1991; Keyser, 2000; McKeachie, 1999)  
	- 
	
	Draw on student experience (Gross Davis, 1993; 
	McKeachie, 1999; Meyers & Jones, 1993).  
  
	- 
	
	CPAI - primary in-class activity is a short 
	informal role play about how the student will apply a selected course topic 
	to a realistic future work situation consistent with his/her career 
	exercises. 
  - 
	
	Student sits in desk next to professor.  
	- 
	
	Student and professor have short informal role 
	playfollowing Word document.  
	- 
	
	In 
	beginning of semester, professor follows outline 
	exactly.  
	- 
	
	Later,  professor discusses 
	topic and future work situation with chosen student, but asks 
	class for application and improvement in operations.  
  
	- 
	
	Application of Operations Management Presentation -
	expanded version of CPAI. 
  - 
	
	Helps students answer 
	open-ended job interview questions, such as, “In the next year or two, how 
	might you help us improve our organization?”  
	- 
	
	Based on case interview technique used by major 
	consulting firms, where interviewee is given case situation and asked to 
	solve a strategic question.  
	See McKinsey & Company website
	 
	
	www.mckinsey.com/careers/how_do_i_apply/how_to_do_well_in_the_interview/case_interview.aspx.  
	- 
	
	Procedure -
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/apre.htm    
	- 
	
	Modify PowerPoint -
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/appompre.ppt    
	- 
	
	Modify Excel -
	
	www.patlyons.com/m3325/hw/AppOMData.xls  
   
  
  
	- 
	
	
	Continuous Improvement 
  - 
	
	Primary input is feedback from 
	students. 
  - 
	
Quick verbal checks 
  - 
	
Class discussion outlines facilitate quick 
	verbal feedback. 
	Class following discussion of a given chapter 
	begins with brief review. 
	If no questions, then professor can be proactive and ask a few questions to 
	obtain appropriate feedback.  
	- 
	
CPAIs may be used for feedback. 
	Especially when used in the volleyball (not ping pong) mode. 
	Professor discusses topic and future work 
	situation with a chosen student, but asks the 
	class for volunteers to discuss the application and improvement in 
	operations. 
	This checks not only knowledge of topic, but also ability to apply it.   
 
	 
	- End-of-term evaluations -
	anonymous paper-based form 
  - 
	
Career exercises - 35 
	students responded,  
	13 saying that career exercises reinforced their existing career plans, 
	22 said they gained new insights into career options.  
	- 
	
CPAIs helpful in understanding application of 
	topics, 
	6 students felt they could learn to apply course 
	topics without CPAIs, 
	29 students felt that CPAIs were helpful. 
	Some did list topics they felt they will apply in their future careers.   
	- 
	
Application of Operations Management presentation, 
	26 students felt they did improve their skill in 
	performing a cost effectiveness analysis, 
	3 felt they did not improve, and
	6 did not respond.  
   
 
	 
 
	
	  
 
	 
	- 
	
	
	Conclusions 
  - 
	
	First conclusion: 
	because students found it straightforward and relatively easy 
	to create and submit CPAIs, other faculty should consider creating similar 
	exercises for their courses.  
	- 
	
	Second: 
	basing CPAIs on each individual student’s career aspirations increases 
	student motivation and should be considered when updating courses.  
	- 
	
	Third: the 
	effort to create the CPAI file is well worth the improvement in class 
	discussions.  
	When students hear how others will apply course topics to future work 
	situations, the other students gain more insight into application of 
	operations management to business and become more engaged in the class. 
	 
   
 
	 
	- 
	
	References 
		- 
		
		Auster, E. R. & Wylie, K. K. 
		(2006). Creating Active Learning in the Classroom: A Systematic 
		Approach. 
		Journal of Management Education: Vol. 30, 
		No. 2, pp 333-353.   
		- 
		
		Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J.A. 
		(1991). 
		Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 
		Washington, DC: George Washington University ERIC Clearinghouse on 
		Higher Education.  
		- 
		
		Gross Davis, B. (1993).
		Tools 
		for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.  
		- 
		
Holland, J. L. (1994) Self-Directed Search, Form R, 4th
		ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.  
		- 
		
		Keyser, M. W. (2000). 
		Active learning and cooperative learning: Understanding the difference 
		and using both styles effectively. 
		Research 
		Strategies, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp 35-44  
		- 
		
		McKeachie,W. J. (1999). 
		Teaching tips: Strategies, research and theory for college and 
		university teachers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.   
		- 
		
		Meyers, C., and T.B. Jones. 
		(1993). 
		Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom. 
		San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.   
		- 
		
		McKinsey & Company, (2008) 
		retrieved Jun 18,  http://www.mckinsey.com/careers/how_do_i_apply/how_to_do_well_in_the_interview/caseCareer-based_interview.aspx. 
   
	  
  - Links to My Presentation and Article
      - 
		
		Active Learning Based on 
		Student Career Aspirations, 
		(presentation outline) at the Fourth International Business, Economics, 
		Environment and Education Summer Symposium, Iona College, June 20, 2009.  
		- 
		
		
		"Active Learning Based 
	on Student Career Aspirations", 
		(formal paper) to appear in the 
	Proceedings of the Fourth International Business, Economics, Environment and 
	Education Summer Symposium, Jun 20, 2009.  
     
   
 
                      
(This page was last edited on 
June 12, 2009
.) 
 |